The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hello All! I'm looking for advice!



Hi Paul

>How many burdens you need depends on your CBUS network design. Suffice
it
>to say that you >need at least 1. I rather suspect that an
"average" UK
>size house probably won't need more than >1 however...

My understanding is that only ONE burden is to be present in a CBUS
Installation...You are allowed to have approx 3 devices with clocks
enabled......

Frank



----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Gordon" <paul@xxxxxxx>
To: "UKHA_D Group" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:54 AM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Hello All! I'm looking for advice!


Can only speak for CBUS, not any other system...

Cable topology with CBUS is completely free, - you can star wire, bus wire,
or a mixture of both. So it's completely up to you if you want (or don't
want) to put 2 wires to a CBUS unit. Switches have screw terminals that
*can* take 2 CAT5 cables into them, but I prefer to run a single cable to
switch positions, home run back to Node 0 and common them there. CBUS
modules (i.e. dimmers, relays, etc.) mostly use RJ45 sockets, and pretty
much all (in my experience) have 2 RJ45 sockets to facilitate continuing
the
network on to the next unit.

You *can* common the cables at Node 0 pretty much any way you choose, any
convenient terminal block and so on. I believe the best method is to common
up a block of RJ45 sockets on a patch panel, then terminate CBUS cables
with
an RJ45 plug and use that as a very tidy and convenient connection point.
(DON'T get these ports mixed up with your Ethernet ones though!)

How many burdens you need depends on your CBUS network design. Suffice it
to
say that you need at least 1. I rather suspect that an "average"
UK size
house probably won't need more than 1 however...

I'm not aware of any particular special Clipsal terminal block for CBUS,
but
it wouldn't surprise me if there was (as you say, for £100 of
course!),
however, like I already mentioned, any common terminating method is
acceptable as long as the termination is good.

HTH

Paul G.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Pete Church
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:01 AM
> To: UKHA_D Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Hello All! I'm looking for advice!
>
> When you put in the mains rated CAT5 for potential CBUS implementation
do
> you need to put 2 wires to each switch for a daisy-chain of modules or
can
> you just put in one and link them all up at either Node 0 or other
> convenient location with a terminal block?  Does this effect the bus
> performance? Do you need more than one burden? Is there a special
Clipsal
> terminal block to do this (for £100+ of course!!!)?
>
> Thanks
>
> Pete
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Chris Hunter
> Sent: 14 January 2007 12:36
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Hello All! I'm looking for advice!
>
> Having some mains-rated Cat-5 could be good idea... suitably run ...
for
> C-Bus or Idratek ...
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> john855042 wrote:
>
> >Hello All,
> >
> >I hope you can offer me some advice as I take my first steps into
the
> >world of home automation!
> >
> >First  about me  10 years engineering in the following fields,
> >CCTV, Data networks, Telephone systems, Alarm systems, Distributed
TV
> >systems, Electronic design (embedded controllers). For the last 6
> >years I have been involved in medical instrumentation, but still
keep
> >an active interest in all my old fields. I have currently around
the
> >house 4 PC's not including work laptops, and I have built them all
> >from scratch, and spend a lot of time tinkering. I would hope then
> >that I have at least some of the skills required to design and fit
a
> >HA system!
> >
> >I'm moving into a new house in the coming weeks and I have
realised
> >that all the systems that I want  CCTV, Security, Telephone,
Video
> >Door Entry, Distributed AV and Heating control could all be
> >integrated into a HA system. I used to fit most of the above
systems
> >as separate entities so I have my own ideas about the kit required
> >but I need a rethink when it comes to HA.
> >
> >Hopefully someone can offer advice on the best system to use. On
my
> >wishlist 
> >
> >HDTV in Living room  - to have Sky HD and Xbox 360 connected
(xbox360
> >is a MCE client)  PIP for video door entry and CCTV events
> >Media Server (MCE/TVersity?)/HA server
> >CCTV (2-3 cameras)
> >Alarm System (panel to interface to HA?)
> >External Lighting & control
> >IP phone system?
> >
> >I want to be able to distribute Sky  maybe via IP or Svideo. At
the
> >moment HD will only be in the living room.
> >
> >I would like something like wall mounted `clients' - touchscreen
LCD
> >perhaps, that can interface with the server to control events,
> >display video or send AV to other local displays. I'm thinking of
> >nanoItx PC's with Linux webbrowsers and Lilliput touchscreens.
> >
> >OK- what I really need to know first is what wiring
recommendations
> >should I follow to cover every eventuality. I'm thinking of 2
Cat5e,
> >2 audio, and 3 or 4 RG59's to every client point from the patch
> >panel. I don't want to have to pull up floorboards and chase walls
> >twice. (my wife wouldn't stand for it!)
> >Also any suggestions on the viability and software choices of my
> >project would be welcome.
> >
> >Thanks in anticipation,
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>








UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.