The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Right-angle RJ45 (sideways)


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Fw: Re Who has got teh worst 1Mb BT line stats


  • Subject: Fw: Re Who has got teh worst 1Mb BT line stats
  • From: Gareth Cook <g@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:31:43 +0100

Both my 2mb lines are , well, 2mb ! The downstream attenuation on both is
around 53db, but the S/N is around 30dB (which is good).

If youre interested, ill dig out the stats exactly later.

G.

Gareth Cook
Tools and Process Architect
IBM SWG Sales - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
AIM Chat : TheBoyG - MSN Chat : chat@xxxxxxx
email: g@xxxxxxx


----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 22/09/2005 16:30 -----

Discussion
Main Topic

ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Today 14:42

.
Subject:
.
Re: Re [ukha_d] Who has got teh worst 1Mb BT line stats
.
Category:



Tim Fletcher wrote:
> My attempts to get my 512ADSL line regraded to 1Mb are falling  on
stony

> ground and I wondered how far I was off the mark.
>
> My Vigor (God Bless it) reports my line stats at 10dB SNR Margin and a
Loop
> Attn of 65 - It is totally stable at this, but 1Meg would
> be nice - how close am I.  Does anyone with a 1Meg line get number
close
to
> this?

My line sucks - but I do have stable 1mb service and have had for about
18 months now (although I had to fight to get it).

Using a ZyXel Prestige 650

noise margin upstream: 18.0 db
output power downstream: 18.0 dbm
attenuation upstream: 31.0 db

noise margin downstream: 9.0 db
output power upstream: 0.0 dbm
attenuation downstream: 63.0 db

D





UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.