Re: IP network CCTV

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jun 3, 6:45=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jun 3, 8:00=A0am, Frank Kurz <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 03/06/2011 5:32 AM, Jim wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 2, 11:11 pm, "RockyTSquirrel"<gafa_...@xxxxxxxxxxx> =A0wrote:
> > >> be sure of the IP =A0bandwidth and static IP address =A0 for the son=
..
> > >> we've had some RF interference problems with certain Wi Fi extenders
> > >> (but we use IP DVR's not the single IP camera..)
> > >> We've had some good results with wireless analog CCTV's up to 400 fe=
et but
> > >> beyond that =A0its iffy.
>
> > >> RTS
>
> > > Re the static IP address. Hmmm ...So, without a mfg provided server,
> > > the son would have to know the IP address of moms house ...... right?
>
> > > I'm not talking about using "IP" cameras. I'm thinking about cameras
> > > that use the local residential Wi Fi network.
>
> > > If mom's house has an Internet connection with a Wi Fi router with
> > > cameras attached to it and daughter is on the other side of the
> > > ( cement brick) wall using Mom's Internet connection (wirelessly) =A0=
I'm
> > > thinking that would/should work. It might even be possible to drill a
> > > hole through the wall for a wired connection. (as long as the landlor=
d
> > > doesn't know about it.) =A0 =A0 =A0( But I suppose that would break s=
ome
> > > fire regulations, come to think of it)
>
> > > Anyone got any thoughts on this?
>
> > It should work well. =A0Try and position the router as close to the com=
mon
> > wall between the units as possible.
>
> > --
> > Frank Kurzwww.firetechs.net
>
> Depends on the thickness of the wall, I've got a setup at work where
> the router is inside an old bank vault and I can barely access it half
> the time from my laptop 50-60 feet away. I wouldn't trust it to be
> reliable for cameras.-

With a vault, I'd expect that it would be steel re-enforced concrete
(?) Rebar, lath?