Re: 2Gig/ Alarm.com / Vivint (APX)

[proguard <sp.kintzonides@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 20 =C1=FD=E3, 18:33, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 8:52=A0am, G. Morgan <G_Mor...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > proguard Wrote:
>
> > >On 20 ???, 09:23, G. Morgan <G_Mor...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> proguard Wrote:
>
> > >> >On 19 ???, 22:02, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >> On Aug 19, 2:45=A0am, Spellcheck Patrol <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wr=
ote:
>
> > >> >> > So if you found these flaws tomorrow would you implore Monkey t=
o stop
> > >> >> > pushing that service or would you just stay hushed because of t=
he rash
> > >> >> > of cut backs and layoffs?
>
> > >> >> Again Tom I don't work that way and there is no rash of cut backs=
 and
> > >> >> layoffs
>
> > >> >Ok, and if i jam GSM and cut phone lines before the break in from
> > >> >entry zone, how this thing copmmunicate with the ARC?
>
> > >> How is *any* system going to communicate in that scenario?
>
> > >Yes but "any" other panel and ARC dont advertise "smash & crash"
> > >By the way they are alternatve ways to communicate by UHF frequencies
> > >directly or remotely to a communicator located in other site with the
> > >phone line and gsm there nd remotely communicate but it is simplex and
> > >costs.
>
> > I'm aware of radio networks and mesh IP networks.
>
> > Cell jammers are illegal, and your average burglar is not even going to
> > know where to get/build one.
>
> I've seen them work but it takes a lot of power to do what he's
> talking about, not likely to happen- =C1=F0=FC=EA=F1=F5=F8=E7 =EA=E5=E9=
=EC=DD=ED=EF=F5 =F3=E5 =F0=E1=F1=DC=E8=E5=F3=E7 -
>
> - =C5=EC=F6=DC=ED=E9=F3=E7 =EA=E5=E9=EC=DD=ED=EF=F5 =F3=E5 =F0=E1=F1=DC=
=E8=E5=F3=E7 -

Someone did that in one of my clients. They left behind the gsm
jammer. It was working with a 12V/7.2 Ah battery.
The break in was on a big factory facilities. After that i did the
patent with UHF and remotely controlled communicator 15 Khm away from
the factory.