The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: xPL Project Migrating away from Yahoo Groups.


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

xPLRioNet v3.9.15 - Rio font and playlist add problems


  • Subject: xPLRioNet v3.9.15 - Rio font and playlist add problems
  • From: "runopenloop" <runopenloop@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:16:48 -0000



Tony,

First thanks for all the hard work.

I upgraded from 3.8j which was mostly working fine.  I'm having 2
problems with 3.9.15:

1.  All the normal video display text is missing vertical segments
such that half of the pixels aren't displayed.  This makes the
display almost unreadable.  For example, a letter "b" might not
show
the vertical line part on the left.  What's odd is that inverse
video text displays perfectly.  For example, when you scroll through
a list of albums or tracks.

Not sure if this is related to the new brightness and contrast
settings.  My clients.xml looks like this:
<rio mac="00:90:00:11:2A:51" ip="192.168.1.100"
xpl="2" lineout="n"
balance="0" contrast="5" brightness="48"
/>

I'm appear to be using receiver.arf since I see Rio - Dell - the
tRio when I boot the Rio.

2.  When I select any song, artist, or album from the web interface,
two copies of the selection are added to the playlist.  For example,
select one album and it appears twice in the playlist.

Would appreciate any ideas or help anyone has to offer.

Thanks,
Rob





xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx

xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.