The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] : Has anyone had their DPF removed ?



Gulp..this is my worry about removing the DPF which involves an ECU
remap w=
hich (together with the free-er flowing exhaust) increases power and
torque=
and so puts more strain on the flywheel.

Marcus=20

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of S=
teve
Sent: 25 October 2012 10:03
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] : Has anyone had their DPF removed ?

Don't start on dual mass flywheels..... =A31.2k :(

On 25 October 2012 08:15, Marcus Warrington
<marcus.warrington@xxxxxxx>w=
rote:

> **
>
>
> Hi Alex
>
> Thanks for the tip but I think it's definitely the DPF as the car
has=20
> been lacking power for a while and I have a Bluetooth ODBII adapter=20
> that I bought off eBay that I use with the "Torque" app on
my Android=20
> phone. Its reporting a specific DPF error about Soot Accumulation
and=20
> another error about regeneration duration failure :(
>
> The cars done 92,000 miles from new so it was going to happen at
some=20
> point and I suppose I should feel grateful that it didn't happen=20
> sooner, I think Ford recommend replacing them at 75,000 miles.
Trouble=20
> is when you start reading up on one problem and then learn about
all=20
> the other potential issues like Dual mass flywheels and Turbos=20
> failures, sometimes ignorance is bliss :)
>
> Oh well, I'll continue ringing around for quotes on removing the DPF.
>
> Marcus
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf=20
> Of Alex Monaghan
> Sent: 24 October 2012 17:06
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] : Has anyone had their DPF removed ?
>
>
> Is it definitely the DPF? My Peugeot 807 failed like this a few
times,=20
> but the local (non Peugeot) mechanic was unable to see the error on=20
> his machine.
> There could be something triggering the fault. Peugeot crank out a=20
> generic error message for many faults, so I guess other ECU's may
do=20
> the same, so I'd suggest getting the actual error codes and checking
this=
.
>
> I did consider having the DPF removed, but settled on getting rid
of=20
> the car due to other non-trivial issues!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:
> ukha_d@xxxxxxx<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>]
On Behalf Of=20
> Marcus Warrington
> Sent: 24 October 2012 15:52
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] : Has anyone had their DPF removed ?
>
> Sorry to be off topic but I know there are a couple of pistonheads
on=20
> the list.
>
> My Ford Focus 1.6TDCI has just gone into "limp home" mode
again with=20
> blocked Diesel Particulate Filter for the second time in 2 months.=20
> Last time Ford did an active regeneration and charged me =A390 but
its=20
> only lasted 2000 miles before blocking up again. I'm now thinking=20
> maybe the best bet would be to rip the sodding out. I've had a
quick=20
> Google around it looks like it costs around =A3300-=A3400 to get it=20
> removed and the have the ECU remapped accordingly.
>
> Has anyone had this done ... is it a good or bad idea ? To be honest
I=20
> just want to get the car running again and if removing the DPF does=20
> this and gives me another 6months to look around and make a
decision=20
> on a new car then I'll be happy. MOT isn't due to next April so I'm=20
> not too worried if the removal actually causes an MOT failure.
>
> Marcus
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>=20=20
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.