The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: (OT) On line photo albums


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: Split CCTV feed - Possible ??


  • Subject: RE: Re: Split CCTV feed - Possible ??
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:29:15 -0000

Yes - I'll also be selling mine but never got around to it - anyone
else interested?

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Brian G. Reynolds
> Sent: 10 January 2007 13:12
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Split CCTV feed - Possible ??
>
> I have everything for it, the dust on top is a optional extra and is
> free.....
>
> Full reply privately sent....
>
> B.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kw1816 [mailto:kw1816@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 10 January 2007 12:46
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Split CCTV feed - Possible ??
>
> If the code I got from the CQC forums doesn't work I will be indeed
> looking for a MV1000. As long as you have all the passwords, How
> much were you thinking of for it ?
>
> Kevin W.
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Brian G. Reynolds"
> <brian.g.reynolds@...> wrote:
> >
> > If it is the MV1000 you are talking about, mine is now up for
> grabs....
> > moving up t'north....
> >
> > B.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kw1816 [mailto:kw1816@...]
> > Sent: 10 January 2007 12:08
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Split CCTV feed - Possible ??
> >
> > IIRC it was good enough for my needs. Only problem is I sold my
> old
> > one (HA Lesson number 163, Equipment is NEVER obsolete! Hoard as
> > much as possible)
> >
> > Don't suppose you'd thought of selling yours ???
> >
> > Kevin W.
> >
> > --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Paul Gale" <groups@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > I've still got an MV1000 but not used it for a couple of
years -
> > wasn't the feed fairly low FPS/quality though????
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of
> > > > clax01011971
> > > > Sent: 10 January 2007 11:38
> > > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Split CCTV feed - Possible ??
> > > >
> > > > I did this with my MV1000, the cameras feed into the MV
and
> also
> > > > into a scart switcher. Works perfectly.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "kw1816"
<kw1816@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > While I think the Geovision system I've got is
great, I have
> a
> > > > need
> > > > > to embed live video (with no user interaction)
into a
> Mainlobby
> > > > > scene. This can be either as a JPG or embedded in
a web page.
> > > > > Closest I've got is a webpage made using the SDK
but you
> still
> > > > need
> > > > > to press a 'Play' button to view the stream. I
know Paul is
> > using
> > > > > the FTP server function to drop images but 
ideally I want a
> > live
> > > > > stream.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was wondering if it's possible to split a CCTV
camera feed
> > using
> > > > a
> > > > > BNC T piece ?  I have this (possibly not so!)
cunning plan to
> > > > > resurrect an MV1000 video server to provide the
streaming
> feed.
> > > > The
> > > > > camera feeds go into a 'T' piece and then one side
into the
> > > > > Geovision card and one side into the MV1000.
Geovision would
> > > > handle
> > > > > all the motion sensing and archiving while the
MV1000 would
> > > > provide
> > > > > just the streaming live feeds.
> > > > >
> > > > > At the back of my mind is a reason why it won't
work but I
> > can't
> > > > put
> > > > > my finger on it :-)
> > > > > Any ideas or suggestions ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Kevin W.
>
>
>
>
>



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.