> Do you know why they dont Phil ? Limitation of the design or choice ?
The "bridge" that is used by the Comfort to C-Bus UCM is more
than capable
of reporting data both ways (the Comfort to C-Bus UCM uses a standard
daughterboard which is used in other applications) so I would assume it's
simply that either it was decided that Comfort wouldn't report back its
state changes to C-Bus (assuming that a Comfort I/O port is mapped directly
to a C-Bus group) or somehow Comfort couldn't do it (which I doubt).
Certainly the hardware interface to C-Bus is perfectly capable of doing
this.
Phil
Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use
this contact form
. Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control
over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed
to the relevant mailing list.