The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [OT] Asterisk at home help + XAP integration



Hi Dean
No Im not currently using CQC ......The pretty screens are done
by the users...The software is biased towards pc programmers ........Check
out the link ..An Oz guys CBUS Menu...I think it looks quite good myself...

http://www.charmedquark.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6142

HTH
Frank



----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean Barrett" <dean@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 7:13 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] Asterisk at home help + XAP integration


Frank

Are you using the CharmedQuark, or tried it - i downloaded the trial and
could see anything that looked like pretty screens :)

I would certainly be interested as it seems to run of Viewsonic
Touchscreens, and works out cheaper the Homegate by a long way !!



Dean.


_____

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Frank Mc Alinden
Sent: 20 October 2005 10:07
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] Asterisk at home help + XAP integration


Hi Chris


>I presume they are going through CGATE ?

Thats correct.........

> will have a look although I
>must admit my preferred software for thte front end is currently
>mainlobby - drop dead gorgeous front end and it speaks to my Russound
>whole house audio system and has good integration with homeseer which
>has good integration with XAP if you follow my drift.

Sounds like your already sorted ;-))..........

Frank


Original Message -----
From: "Chris Purves" <CHRIS_PURVES@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:26 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] Asterisk at home help + XAP integration


I presume they are going through CGATE ? I will have a look although I
must admit my preferred software for thte front end is currently
Mainlobby - drop dead gorgeous front end and it speaks to my Russound
whole house audio system and has good integration with homeseer which
has good integration with XAP if you follow my drift.

Chris




--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Frank Mc Alinden" <frankmc@i...>
wrote:
>
> Hi Chris
>
>             Might be an idea  to have a look at CQC software....Some
nice
> Graphics ...They have a CBUS  Plugin and there was talk of having a
xAP
> plugin....
> http://www.charmedquark.com/
>
> Go into the Forum section and theres a CBUS thread with some nice
> touchscreen pics ...
>
> HTH
> Frank
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Purves" <CHRIS_PURVES@M...>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 8:37 PM
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] Asterisk at home help + XAP integration
>
>
> Paul - any chance of a copy of your config files ? I have not even
> gone near that aspect yet but have printed a ton of stuff from the net
> that might help me. You're not using sipgate by any chance are you ?
>
> I always struggle to understand the difference between xap and xpl. I
> have only used xap so far (with CBUS via the CBUS/XAP gateway).
>
> I have 3 touchpanels around the house so I am keen to get integrating
> when support arrives.
>
> Ta
> Chris
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Paul Gale" <groups@s...>
wrote:
> >
> > xAP support for Asterisk is still being worked on but I've not
heard
> anything for a couple of weeks. Should be good though - I've asked for
> message waiting support which would allow good integration into my HA
> network.
> >
> > I have the same config as you - Dell server, *@H, SPA3000 - works
> really well.
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of
> > > Ian Lowe
> > > Sent: 19 October 2005 11:01
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Asterisk at home help + XAP
integration
> > >
> > > Asterisk at Home has xPL built in, not xAP.
> > >
> > > If you have xAP bits and bobs already, I think there's a xAP
> module for
> > > Asterisk (not quite sure about the mechanics of AAH vs
Asterisk
> raw there)
> > > -
> > > I'm sure Patrick or Kevin mentioned that previously?
> > >
> > > If you don't have an existing set of tools, have a look at
xPL.
> (there's a
> > > yahoo group over here: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx )
> > >
> > > Ian.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of
> > > christopher purves
> > > Sent: 19 October 2005 10:43
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Asterisk at home help + XAP
integration
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Well I have finally installed *@home and as I know quite a
few of
> you use
> > > it
> > > I wanted comments on my master plan before I set out to
check
I'm not
> > > being
> > > an idiot.
> > >
> > > I have installed *@Home on a Dell £99 server (TM) and that
all
> seems fine
> > > -
> > > painless install.
> > >
> > > I propose the following - use Linksys PAB2 adapters on all
fixed
> analogue
> > > phones in the house. Buy a sipura 3000 to connect in the
POTS land
> line
> > > and
> > > to plug an 'emergency' phone into - on a power fail a relay
in the
> sipura
> > > bridges the FXO and FXS ports so I can still use the
emergency
> phone no
> > > matter what.
> > >
> > > I have a couple of sipgate numbers now - I was gonna use one
for
> voice and
> > > one for fax and route appropriately.
> > >
> > > I think I simply need to enable XAP in the * config to get
XAP
> messages ?
> > >
> > > Does that make some kinda sense?
> > >
> > > Ta
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>









UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.