[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT Document archiving...continued
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: OT Document archiving...continued
- From: "David Buckley" <db@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:33:32 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Brian G. Reynolds"
<brian.g.reynolds@xxxxxxx; wrote:
> Do any of you "legal" types know what the "law" is
for
> scanning documents?
I got (far too deeply!) involved in this question for a chunk of the
UK government a couple of years back, in terms of legal
admissability in court of scanned documents. This was to process
millions of documents per annum. Basically the aim was to prevent a
row incourt, with the oposing council saying "that document came
>from
trusted".
Based on work done (IIRC) by the BSI, the general approach is that
you must have a unified process all documents go through, so that
you can say that if you can prove document A is preserved in a
trustworthy manner, then documents B,C,... are also trustworthy, as
they have undergone the same process.
David.
UK Home Automation Meet 2004 - BOOK NOW!
http://www.ukha2004.com
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|