The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: OT - DVD writers



Title: Re: [ukha_d] Re: OT - DVD writers
Jason,
 
But you're not trusting it to a single HD.... you're making a BACKUP on a different one... that's the point!
 
I'm not disagreeing that DVD-writers have other benefits, but if all you're looking for is a backup, then they aren't the cheapest solution.
 
The point about a backup is that it's an EXTRA copy... so you don't have a single point of failure anywhere.
 
M.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Lee [mailto:jasonjlee@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Sun 07/07/2002 00:32
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: OT - DVD writers

To me, anything that is important enough to not lose, I wouldn't trust the
backup to a single hd.

They fail.

As they did when *TWO* 75Gig Ibms died without warning, taking 2 weeks of
coding with it. (I was lucky I had been backing up to the dvd-ram before
then). As your in IT I think you will know the drives I am referring too. I
had them just after launch when the great reviews were around, before the
faulty units started to appear. If I remember correctly it was something to
do with when they bought the Hungary factory online. I don't make the same
mistake twice, so I won't trust HD for backups again.

Now HD space cheaper than dvd-r?

89p for 4.3g DVD-RW
Say 10 disks.. £8.90. 43gig..
Now you have to factor in the cost of the dvd-r etc,etc, but as I said
before dvd writers have side benefits.
(But then in your example you factor in the pc which you costed at £200.)

And you have to manage the media, but thats not too bad.

What I'm after is an affordable DVD autoloader. If Yamaha Japan would just
reply to my emails..

Anyway, I think we can agree to disagree. To each his own.

J

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 8:02 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT - DVD writers


> Jason,
>
> As I said - "if your requirement is simply _backup_".
>
> I _am_ prepared to put _backups_ on a non-RAID HDD... because _backup_
means "spare copy".
>
> I was over-simplifying about the archive usage - the HDD is question is,
itself, backed up, to an Application Service Provider with a full HSM backup
offering that does a full delta-block backup... I'm guessing, however, that
this would be out of Ray's price range if he's talking about buying a
DVD-writer :-)
>
> The point was that hard disk space is, now, rather cheaper than tape, or
blank optical media... so if the solution really is a _backup_, a copy to
another PC is actually the cheapest way to go. I know that a number of
people on this group use _removable_ IDE drives for this purpose...
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Lee [mailto:jasonjlee@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sat 06/07/2002 11:49
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: OT - DVD writers
>
>
>
> Um, I would have said the same thing before I experienced IBM hard drives
a
> while ago.
>
> As a cheap solution, yeah maybe. But Hard Disks fail..
>
> I bet you don't put any data you couldn't live without on that system at
> work, unless its raided?
>
> Plus having a dvdwriter has side benefits.
>
> The 'which disk is that on' I am working on.. Once I've got the projects
> I've already started finished!
>
> oh and double sided disks are around for dvd-r.. not sure of the quality
> though.
>
> J
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mark_harrison_uk1" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 11:43 AM
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: OT - DVD writers
>
>
> Ray,
>
> If you requirement is simply backup for that kind of data volume,
> there's a more cost-effective, and fast solution than either you
> propose.
>
> A second PC (second-hand, a P2 would be fine), with a, say, 60Gb HDD
> in it, a couple of network cards and a crossover cable - and lo, your
> ideal backup solution for about £200.
>
> It's what I do at home for backup... it's also what we now do at work
> for long-term archiving of the digital images for the comet website!
> The cost equation of hardware was about the same, but once you took
> into account the indexing problem (which CD is that photo on)... it
> became an obvious thing to do.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
> --- In ukha_d@y..., "Ray Barnett" <lists@t...> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wanted a quick bit of advice since I gather some people here
> use them a
> > fair bit...
> >
> > I urgently need to implement a backup system capable of looking
> after my
> > rapidly growing 20GBs of digital photos.
> >
> > Current favourites are a DVD writer or an Onstream 60GB tape thingy.
> > However, I've just confused myself over the compatibilities of the
> various
> > DVD writers. Just how compatible is a DVD-R writer, and is it a
> dead duck
> > now that DVD+R is getting more popular?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ray Barnett.
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
> service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
> around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>



------------------------


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.