The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Flame was (Mark ?)


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Flame was (Mark ?)
  • From: "Jon Whiten" <jon@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 00:08:40 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I failed my English O Level twice.  My first real job though was
documenting
a companies Quality System for ISO9000 (BS5750 as it was known)! I should
have done CSE really, but refused that as I would have had to have done
English Lit - Bottom Class O Level was exempt!

Regards,

Jon
http://www.whiten.co.uk/


-----Original Message-----
From: steve [mailto:steve@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 06 August 2001 19:57
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Flame was (Mark ?)


I failed my English too. I was also told i would need it to follow a
technical job. In my first job as electronic technician i actually ended up
spell checking the documentation of the engineer above me whoose spelling
was worse than mine.

My main problem with emails if that my line of thought goes faster than my
2-3 fingers and this usually leaves silly mistakes. I need to re-read but
often i have hit the send button.

If i wanted English lessons i could go to college but it is of no more
interest to me now than when i was 16.

Could the offending comma's be changed for .............. doesn't bother me
either way but would be easier on the eyes. If the contents not interesting
my filter is the key marked 'DEL'

The main thing is lets keep the group 'family' and leave out the English
lessons and stick to technical debate.

Steve.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.