[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: [Development] Lights, using two micros.
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: [Development] Lights, using two micros.
- From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:24:18 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Yep, James has got it
Be Afraid....Be VERY Afraid :-)
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: James Hoye [mailto:james.hoye@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 03 June 2001 19:38
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: [Development] Lights, using two micros.
This email was delivered to you by The Free Internet,
a Business Online Group company. http://www.thefreeinternet.net
---------------------------------------------------------------
> We use _alot_ of 12C508 micros so with a bit of luck may be able to
get
> these at cost.
>
> Whilst I like the idea of hard-coding an address into the PIC, this
does
add
> another operation/stock-line to productionising the product and hence
an
> added cost. Depends, of course, on quantity though.
I suppose the reason for not having address jumpers was the lack of spare
I/O pins available on the 12C508. If I'm right, then it means I'm starting
to understand what Keith and John are on about :)
James H
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|