[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: ADSL - Static IP
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ADSL - Static IP
- From: patrickl@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 17:34:47 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- In ukha_d@y..., "James, Daniel" <daniel.james@e...>
wrote:
>=20=20
>=20
> > So? The point I am making is that no-nat is widely available,
not=20
> > that it was available at bargain basement prices. You pays
your=20
> > money, you takes your choice.
>=20
> I take your point, but I am just about getting =A350 per month for=20
ADSL past
> SWMBO, and that's quite hard to justify for home use, and home use=20
was what
> I was looking for, so bargain basement it is while I'm footing the=20
bill :-)
OK, sorry I was a bit grumpy earlier. NAT for USB ADSL is prevalent=20
cos of the scarcity of IP addresses and the home use emphasis.
Patrick
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|